Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator

Evaluate the clinical appropriateness of diagnostic cardiac catheterization based on established guidelines.

Calculator Inputs

Scoring Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Appropriateness

Category	Criteria	Points
Primary Clinical Symptom	Typical Angina	3
	Atypical Angina	2
	Non-Anginal Chest Pain	1
	Dyspnea/Heart Failure Symptoms	2
	Asymptomatic	0
Prior Non-Invasive Stress Test Result	High-Risk Ischemia	4
	Intermediate-Risk Ischemia	2
	Low-Risk Ischemia	1
	Negative/Normal Stress Test	0
	No Recent Stress Test Performed (if symptoms present)	1
Known CAD History	Prior PCI or CABG	3
	Known Non-Obstructive CAD	1
	No Known CAD	0
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)	LVEF < 35%	3
	LVEF 35-49%	2
	LVEF ≥ 50%	0
	Unknown/Not Assessed	1
Number of Major CAD Risk Factors	0-1 Risk Factors	0
	2-3 Risk Factors	1
	4+ Risk Factors	2

What is Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization?

The Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator is a tool designed to help clinicians and patients evaluate whether a diagnostic cardiac catheterization (coronary angiography) is clinically indicated based on established guidelines. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization is an invasive procedure used to visualize the coronary arteries and assess for blockages (coronary artery disease, CAD). While highly effective, it carries risks and costs, making judicious use essential.

These criteria, often developed by professional medical societies like the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA), categorize indications for procedures as “Appropriate,” “May Be Appropriate (Uncertain),” or “Rarely Appropriate (Inappropriate).” The goal is to ensure that patients receive the right care at the right time, avoiding unnecessary procedures while ensuring timely intervention for those who truly need it.

Who Should Use the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator?

• Cardiologists and Physicians: To guide clinical decision-making, ensure adherence to guidelines, and facilitate discussions with patients.
• Healthcare Administrators: For quality improvement initiatives, resource allocation, and understanding practice patterns.
• Medical Students and Residents: As an educational tool to learn the indications for diagnostic cardiac catheterization.
• Patients: To better understand the rationale behind their physician’s recommendations and engage in informed decision-making regarding their cardiac care.

Common Misconceptions about Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization

• A “score” dictates treatment: The calculator provides a score and category, but it’s a guide, not a rigid rule. Clinical judgment, patient preferences, and unique circumstances always play a crucial role.
• Inappropriate means malpractice: An “inappropriate” classification doesn’t automatically imply poor care. It suggests that, based on typical scenarios, the procedure’s benefits might not outweigh its risks. There can be valid exceptions.
• It replaces clinical expertise: This calculator is a decision-support tool, not a replacement for a thorough clinical evaluation, patient history, physical examination, and the expertise of a cardiologist.
• It’s only about cost-saving: While reducing unnecessary procedures can save costs, the primary aim of the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator is to improve patient outcomes by ensuring procedures are performed when they are most beneficial.

Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Formula and Mathematical Explanation

The Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator uses a simplified scoring system based on key clinical parameters derived from established guidelines. Each parameter is assigned a specific point value, reflecting its contribution to the overall appropriateness of performing a diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The sum of these points determines the final appropriateness category.

Step-by-Step Derivation:

1. Identify Key Clinical Variables: We select critical factors that influence the decision for diagnostic catheterization, such as patient symptoms, results of prior non-invasive tests, known cardiac history, left ventricular function, and overall risk profile.
2. Assign Point Values: Each specific finding within a variable (e.g., “Typical Angina” for symptoms, “High-Risk Ischemia” for stress test) is assigned a point value. Higher points are given to findings that strongly support the need for catheterization.
3. Sum the Points: The points from all selected variables are added together to yield a “Total Appropriateness Score.”
4. Categorize the Score: The total score is then compared against predefined thresholds to classify the indication as “Appropriate,” “Uncertain/May Be Appropriate,” or “Inappropriate.”

Variable Explanations:

The formula is a simple summation: Total Score = Symptom Points + Stress Test Points + CAD History Points + LVEF Points + Risk Factor Points.

The interpretation of the total score is as follows:

• Total Score ≥ 8: Appropriate
• Total Score 4-7: Uncertain / May Be Appropriate
• Total Score < 4: Inappropriate

Variables Table:

Key Variables for Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization

Variable	Meaning	Unit	Typical Range (Points)
Primary Clinical Symptom	Patient’s main presenting cardiac symptom.	Points	0-3
Prior Non-Invasive Stress Test Result	Severity of ischemia or normality of recent stress testing.	Points	0-4
Known CAD History	Presence of prior revascularization or diagnosed non-obstructive CAD.	Points	0-3
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)	Measure of heart’s pumping efficiency.	Points	0-3
Number of Major CAD Risk Factors	Count of significant risk factors for coronary artery disease.	Points	0-2
Total Appropriateness Score	Sum of all individual points.	Points	0-15 (approx.)

Practical Examples (Real-World Use Cases)

Example 1: Patient with High-Risk Features

Scenario: A 62-year-old male presents with typical exertional angina. He has a history of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (3 risk factors). A recent stress echocardiogram showed high-risk ischemia involving >10% of the myocardium, and his LVEF is 40%. He has no prior history of PCI or CABG.

• Primary Clinical Symptom: Typical Angina (3 points)
• Prior Non-Invasive Stress Test Result: High-Risk Ischemia (4 points)
• Known CAD History: No Known CAD (0 points)
• Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): LVEF 35-49% (2 points)
• Number of Major CAD Risk Factors: 3 risk factors (1 point)

Calculation: 3 + 4 + 0 + 2 + 1 = 10 points

Output: Total Score: 10 points. Appropriateness: Appropriate.

Interpretation: Given the patient’s typical angina, high-risk stress test, and reduced LVEF, diagnostic catheterization is strongly indicated to define coronary anatomy and guide revascularization strategies. This aligns with the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator.

Example 2: Asymptomatic Patient with Low-Risk Findings

Scenario: A 55-year-old female is asymptomatic but has a family history of CAD. She has well-controlled hypertension (1 risk factor). A recent exercise treadmill test was negative for ischemia, and her LVEF is 60%. She has no known CAD history.

• Primary Clinical Symptom: Asymptomatic (0 points)
• Prior Non-Invasive Stress Test Result: Negative/Normal Stress Test (0 points)
• Known CAD History: No Known CAD (0 points)
• Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): LVEF ≥ 50% (0 points)
• Number of Major CAD Risk Factors: 1 risk factor (0 points)

Calculation: 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0 points

Output: Total Score: 0 points. Appropriateness: Inappropriate.

Interpretation: For an asymptomatic patient with a negative stress test and no other compelling indications, diagnostic catheterization is not recommended. The risks of the procedure outweigh any potential benefits in this low-probability scenario, as indicated by the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator.

How to Use This Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator

Using the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator is straightforward and designed to provide a quick assessment based on key clinical data. Follow these steps to get your results:

Step-by-Step Instructions:

1. Access the Calculator: Navigate to the calculator section on this page.
2. Input Primary Clinical Symptom: From the dropdown menu, select the option that best describes the patient’s primary cardiac symptom (e.g., Typical Angina, Asymptomatic).
3. Input Prior Non-Invasive Stress Test Result: Choose the most relevant result from any recent non-invasive stress testing (e.g., High-Risk Ischemia, Negative/Normal Stress Test).
4. Input Known CAD History: Select whether the patient has a history of prior revascularization (PCI/CABG) or known non-obstructive CAD.
5. Input Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): Provide the patient’s LVEF percentage, if known.
6. Input Number of Major CAD Risk Factors: Enter the count of major risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, or family history of CAD.
7. Calculate: Click the “Calculate Appropriateness” button. The calculator will automatically update the results as you change inputs.
8. Reset: If you wish to start over, click the “Reset” button to clear all inputs and return to default values.

How to Read Results:

The results section will display:

• Primary Result: A prominent display indicating the overall appropriateness category: “Appropriate,” “Uncertain/May Be Appropriate,” or “Inappropriate.” This will be color-coded for quick understanding.
• Total Appropriateness Score: The numerical sum of all points assigned based on your inputs.
• Points from Each Category: A breakdown of how many points were contributed by each input category (Symptoms, Stress Test, CAD History, LVEF, Risk Factors).
• Formula Explanation: A brief explanation of how the total score translates into the appropriateness categories.

Decision-Making Guidance:

• “Appropriate” Result: Suggests that the benefits of diagnostic cardiac catheterization are likely to outweigh the risks, aligning with established guidelines. This typically supports proceeding with the procedure.
• “Uncertain/May Be Appropriate” Result: Indicates that the clinical scenario is not clear-cut. The benefits may or may not outweigh the risks. This category often warrants further discussion, additional non-invasive testing, or careful consideration of patient preferences and other clinical factors.
• “Inappropriate” Result: Suggests that the risks of diagnostic cardiac catheterization are likely to outweigh the benefits, and the procedure is generally not recommended based on current guidelines. Alternative diagnostic or management strategies should be considered.

Remember, this Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator is a decision-support tool. Always integrate its findings with comprehensive clinical judgment and patient-specific factors.

Key Factors That Affect Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Results

The determination of appropriate use for diagnostic cardiac catheterization is multifactorial. Several key clinical factors significantly influence the outcome of the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator and the ultimate decision to proceed with the procedure:

1. Severity and Characteristics of Symptoms: The nature of chest pain (typical angina, atypical, non-anginal) or other cardiac symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, heart failure symptoms) is paramount. Typical angina, especially if new or worsening, carries a higher likelihood of obstructive CAD and thus a higher appropriateness score. Asymptomatic patients generally score lower unless other high-risk factors are present.
2. Results of Prior Non-Invasive Testing: The presence and extent of ischemia on stress testing (e.g., stress echocardiography, nuclear stress test) are critical. High-risk ischemia strongly supports catheterization, while a negative or low-risk stress test significantly reduces the appropriateness score. The absence of recent stress testing in a symptomatic patient can also influence the score.
3. Known Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) History: Patients with a history of prior revascularization (PCI or CABG) or documented non-obstructive CAD often have different indications for diagnostic catheterization. For instance, recurrent symptoms after PCI/CABG might warrant re-evaluation, increasing the appropriateness.
4. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF): A reduced LVEF, particularly if severe (<35%), is a strong indicator of potential underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy and often increases the appropriateness for diagnostic catheterization, especially in the context of symptoms or ischemia.
5. Number and Severity of CAD Risk Factors: While individual risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, family history) contribute, their cumulative presence increases the pre-test probability of CAD. A higher number of risk factors generally contributes to a higher appropriateness score, though typically less than direct evidence of ischemia or severe symptoms.
6. Clinical Urgency and Presentation: While not directly an input in this simplified calculator, the acute clinical context (e.g., stable angina vs. acute coronary syndrome) profoundly impacts the decision. Acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, NSTEMI, STEMI) generally warrant urgent catheterization, often bypassing some of the non-invasive steps. This calculator primarily focuses on stable or less acute scenarios.

Understanding these factors helps in interpreting the results from the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator and applying them effectively in clinical practice.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What are Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC)?

A: Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) are guidelines developed by medical professional societies to help clinicians determine when specific medical tests, procedures, or treatments are clinically indicated. They categorize indications as Appropriate, Uncertain/May Be Appropriate, or Inappropriate, based on the balance of benefits and risks for typical patients.

Q: Why is an Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator important?

A: The Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator helps ensure that diagnostic cardiac catheterization, an invasive procedure, is performed only when its benefits outweigh its risks. It promotes high-quality, evidence-based care, reduces unnecessary procedures, and optimizes resource utilization.

Q: Does an “Inappropriate” result mean the procedure should never be done?

A: Not necessarily. An “Inappropriate” result from the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator suggests that, in most typical scenarios, the risks outweigh the benefits. However, unique patient circumstances, comorbidities, or specific clinical judgments might still warrant the procedure. It prompts a deeper discussion and consideration of alternatives.

Q: How accurate is this calculator compared to official AUC documents?

A: This Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator provides a simplified model based on the principles of official AUC documents. While it captures the essence of the criteria, it does not encompass every nuanced clinical scenario or all specific point values found in comprehensive official guidelines. It serves as an educational and decision-support tool, not a substitute for the full guidelines or clinical expertise.

Q: Can this calculator be used for acute coronary syndromes?

A: This calculator is primarily designed for stable or less acute clinical scenarios. For acute coronary syndromes (e.g., STEMI, NSTEMI, unstable angina), the indications for urgent diagnostic catheterization are often more straightforward and time-sensitive, and may not require a detailed AUC assessment.

Q: What if a patient has multiple symptoms or conflicting test results?

A: The Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator attempts to account for the primary symptom and the most relevant stress test result. In complex cases with multiple conflicting factors, the “Uncertain/May Be Appropriate” category might be reached, emphasizing the need for thorough clinical evaluation and expert consultation.

Q: What are the risks of diagnostic cardiac catheterization?

A: Risks include bleeding or bruising at the access site, infection, kidney injury from contrast dye, allergic reactions, stroke, heart attack, and, rarely, death. The balance of these risks against the potential benefits is what the Appropriate Use Criteria for Diagnostic Catheterization Calculator aims to assess.

Q: Where can I find the official Appropriate Use Criteria documents?

A: Official Appropriate Use Criteria documents are typically published by major cardiology societies such as the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA). Their websites are the best source for the most current and comprehensive guidelines.

Related Tools and Internal Resources

Explore other valuable resources and tools to enhance your understanding of cardiac health and diagnostic procedures:

• Cardiac Catheterization Overview
  Learn more about the procedure, its benefits, and potential risks.
• Stress Test Interpretation Guide
  Understand how different types of stress tests are performed and their results interpreted.
• Coronary Artery Disease Management Strategies
  Explore various approaches to managing CAD, from lifestyle changes to medical therapies.
• Acute Coronary Syndrome Treatment Options
  Information on the urgent care and treatment for heart attacks and unstable angina.
• Valvular Heart Disease Diagnosis
  A guide to diagnosing and understanding conditions affecting heart valves.
• Heart Failure Management Guidelines
  Comprehensive information on diagnosing and managing heart failure.

// and
// For the purpose of this exercise, I'll create a very basic mock Chart object that allows the drawChart function to run without errors.
// This is a simplification to meet the "no external libraries" rule while still demonstrating chart functionality.
// A full Chart.js implementation would be much larger.

// Minimal Chart.js mock for demonstration purposes
function Chart(ctx, config) {
this.ctx = ctx;
this.config = config;
this.data = config.data;
this.options = config.options;

this.destroy = function() {
// In a real Chart.js, this would clean up the canvas.
// For this mock, we just clear the canvas.
this.ctx.clearRect(0, 0, this.ctx.canvas.width, this.ctx.canvas.height);
};

this.update = function() {
this.destroy();
this.render();
};

this.render = function() {
var canvas = this.ctx.canvas;
var width = canvas.width;
var height = canvas.height;

// Clear canvas
this.ctx.clearRect(0, 0, width, height);

// Draw axes (simplified)
this.ctx.beginPath();
this.ctx.moveTo(50, 10);
this.ctx.lineTo(50, height - 30);
this.ctx.lineTo(width - 10, height - 30);
this.ctx.strokeStyle = '#666';
this.ctx.stroke();

// Draw labels (simplified)
this.ctx.font = '10px Arial';
this.ctx.fillStyle = '#333';
this.ctx.fillText('Score', 10, height / 2);
this.ctx.fillText('Your Score', width / 2 - 30, height - 15);

var maxScore = this.options.scales.y.max;
var barHeightScale = (height - 40) / maxScore; // Adjusted for padding

// Draw bars
var barData = this.data.datasets[0].data[0];
var barColor = this.data.datasets[0].backgroundColor;
var barWidth = 60;
var x = (width / 2) - (barWidth / 2);
var barActualHeight = barData * barHeightScale;
var y = (height - 30) - barActualHeight;

this.ctx.fillStyle = barColor;
this.ctx.fillRect(x, y, barWidth, barActualHeight);

// Draw score text on bar
this.ctx.fillStyle = '#fff';
this.ctx.textAlign = 'center';
this.ctx.fillText(barData + ' pts', x + barWidth / 2, y + barActualHeight / 2);

// Draw annotation lines
var annotations = this.options.annotation.annotations;
for (var i = 0; i < annotations.length; i++) { var annotation = annotations[i]; if (annotation.type === 'line' && annotation.mode === 'horizontal') { var lineY = (height - 30) - (annotation.value * barHeightScale); this.ctx.beginPath(); this.ctx.moveTo(50, lineY); this.ctx.lineTo(width - 10, lineY); this.ctx.strokeStyle = annotation.borderColor; this.ctx.lineWidth = annotation.borderWidth; this.ctx.setLineDash([5, 5]); // Dashed line this.ctx.stroke(); this.ctx.setLineDash([]); // Reset line dash if (annotation.label && annotation.label.enabled) { this.ctx.fillStyle = annotation.label.backgroundColor; this.ctx.font = annotation.label.font.size + 'px Arial'; var labelText = annotation.label.content; var labelWidth = this.ctx.measureText(labelText).width + 10; var labelHeight = annotation.label.font.size + 10; var labelX = annotation.label.position === 'end' ? width - labelWidth - 15 : 55; var labelY = lineY - labelHeight / 2; this.ctx.fillRect(labelX, labelY, labelWidth, labelHeight); this.ctx.fillStyle = '#fff'; this.ctx.fillText(labelText, labelX + labelWidth / 2, lineY + annotation.label.font.size / 2); } } } }; this.render(); // Initial render } function getInputValue(id) { var element = document.getElementById(id); if (element.tagName === 'SELECT') { return parseFloat(element.value); } else if (element.tagName === 'INPUT') { return parseFloat(element.value); } return NaN; } function validateInput(id, min, max) { var value = getInputValue(id); var errorElement = document.getElementById(id + "Error"); if (isNaN(value) || value < min || value > max) {
errorElement.style.display = 'block';
return false;
} else {
errorElement.style.display = 'none';
return true;
}
}

function calculateAUC() {
var primarySymptomPoints = getInputValue("primarySymptom");
var stressTestPoints = getInputValue("stressTestResult");
var cadHistoryPoints = getInputValue("cadHistory");
var lvefPoints = getInputValue("lvef");
var riskFactorsCount = getInputValue("riskFactors");

// Validate inputs
var isValid = true;
if (!validateInput("primarySymptom", 0, 4)) isValid = false; // 0 is 'Select Symptom' or 'Asymptomatic', max 3 for typical angina, but 4 for high risk stress test
if (!validateInput("stressTestResult", 0, 4)) isValid = false;
if (!validateInput("cadHistory", 0, 3)) isValid = false;
if (!validateInput("lvef", 0, 3)) isValid = false;
if (!validateInput("riskFactors", 0, 5)) isValid = false; // Max 5 risk factors, points 0-2

if (!isValid) {
document.getElementById("resultsSection").style.display = 'none';
return;
}

var riskFactorPoints;
if (riskFactorsCount >= 4) {
riskFactorPoints = 2;
} else if (riskFactorsCount >= 2) {
riskFactorPoints = 1;
} else {
riskFactorPoints = 0;
}

var totalScore = primarySymptomPoints + stressTestPoints + cadHistoryPoints + lvefPoints + riskFactorPoints;

var appropriatenessCategory;
var resultClass = '';
var appropriateThreshold = 8;
var uncertainThreshold = 4;

if (totalScore >= appropriateThreshold) {
appropriatenessCategory = "Appropriate";
resultClass = 'appropriate';
} else if (totalScore >= uncertainThreshold) {
appropriatenessCategory = "Uncertain / May Be Appropriate";
resultClass = 'uncertain';
} else {
appropriatenessCategory = "Inappropriate";
resultClass = 'inappropriate';
}

document.getElementById("primaryResult").innerHTML = "" + appropriatenessCategory + "";
document.getElementById("primaryResult").className = "primary-result " + resultClass;
document.getElementById("totalScore").innerText = totalScore;
document.getElementById("symptomPoints").innerText = primarySymptomPoints;
document.getElementById("stressTestPoints").innerText = stressTestPoints;
document.getElementById("cadHistoryPoints").innerText = cadHistoryPoints;
document.getElementById("lvefPoints").innerText = lvefPoints;
document.getElementById("riskFactorPoints").innerText = riskFactorPoints;
document.getElementById("formulaExplanation").innerText = "Based on a total score of " + totalScore + " points, where " + appropriateThreshold + " points or more is 'Appropriate', " + uncertainThreshold + "-" + (appropriateThreshold - 1) + " points is 'Uncertain/May Be Appropriate', and less than " + uncertainThreshold + " points is 'Inappropriate'.";

document.getElementById("resultsSection").style.display = 'block';

drawChart(totalScore, appropriateThreshold, uncertainThreshold);
}

function resetCalculator() {
document.getElementById("primarySymptom").value = "0";
document.getElementById("stressTestResult").value = "0";
document.getElementById("cadHistory").value = "0";
document.getElementById("lvef").value = "0";
document.getElementById("riskFactors").value = "2"; // Default to 2 risk factors for a neutral start

document.getElementById("primarySymptomError").style.display = 'none';
document.getElementById("stressTestResultError").style.display = 'none';
document.getElementById("cadHistoryError").style.display = 'none';
document.getElementById("lvefError").style.display = 'none';
document.getElementById("riskFactorsError").style.display = 'none';

document.getElementById("resultsSection").style.display = 'none';

// Redraw chart with default values
drawChart(0, 8, 4); // Assuming 0 points for all default selections
}

function copyResults() {
var primaryResultText = document.getElementById("primaryResult").innerText;
var totalScoreText = document.getElementById("totalScore").innerText;
var symptomPointsText = document.getElementById("symptomPoints").innerText;
var stressTestPointsText = document.getElementById("stressTestPoints").innerText;
var cadHistoryPointsText = document.getElementById("cadHistoryPoints").innerText;
var lvefPointsText = document.getElementById("lvefPoints").innerText;
var riskFactorPointsText = document.getElementById("riskFactorPoints").innerText;
var formulaExplanationText = document.getElementById("formulaExplanation").innerText;

var copyText = "Appropriateness Assessment Results:\n" +
"Overall Appropriateness: " + primaryResultText + "\n" +
"Total Appropriateness Score: " + totalScoreText + " points\n" +
"Points from Symptoms: " + symptomPointsText + " points\n" +
"Points from Stress Test: " + stressTestPointsText + " points\n" +
"Points from CAD History: " + cadHistoryPointsText + " points\n" +
"Points from LVEF: " + lvefPointsText + " points\n" +
"Points from Risk Factors: " + riskFactorPointsText + " points\n\n" +
"Explanation: " + formulaExplanationText + "\n\n" +
"Assumptions:\n" +
"- This calculator uses a simplified scoring system based on common AUC principles.\n" +
"- Clinical judgment and patient-specific factors are always paramount.";

navigator.clipboard.writeText(copyText).then(function() {
alert("Results copied to clipboard!");
}, function(err) {
console.error('Could not copy text: ', err);
alert("Failed to copy results. Please try manually.");
});
}

// Initial calculation and chart draw on page load
window.onload = function() {
resetCalculator(); // Set initial values and draw chart
calculateAUC(); // Perform initial calculation based on default values
};